Discovering Climate Change

Finding and tracking the discussion on climate change for myself. I am also trying to stop biting my fingernails.
aucklandbloodyauckland:

This newspaper clipping tells of what should have happened to Auckland’s transport network many years ago.

Auckland has had many woes such as this one, keeping Aucklanders stuck in our cars or waiting at the platform. We have been wrapped up in an ideology from the 70’s that personal cars = freedom. Wrong! Choice = freedom. Still today, central government find more pleasure propping up their industry pals in building uneconomic highways than servicing their people and economy through rail and other smart transport infrastructure. More transport options will move us faster within our city and beyond fossil fuels.

aucklandbloodyauckland:

This newspaper clipping tells of what should have happened to Auckland’s transport network many years ago.

Auckland has had many woes such as this one, keeping Aucklanders stuck in our cars or waiting at the platform. We have been wrapped up in an ideology from the 70’s that personal cars = freedom. Wrong! Choice = freedom. Still today, central government find more pleasure propping up their industry pals in building uneconomic highways than servicing their people and economy through rail and other smart transport infrastructure. More transport options will move us faster within our city and beyond fossil fuels.

Never alone

One thing is more important than having the right campaign strategy - people. It’s hard to be more precise than that because it covers many areas but the bottom line is, if you want to change the hearts and minds of others, you can’t do it alone. One lone soldier is not going to win a battle, but one small and cohesive group can make a difference.

It’s like an old technique first developed by Alexander the Great. Back in the 4th century BCE he conquered Europe and the Middle East. My memory of this from Classics is faint, but I’ll do my best to recall. In one of his greatest battles against the Persians, he was hugely out-numbered by size and power - they had elephants and charriots that would have slaughtered his small travelling army had he engaged in traditional warfare. What he did, though, was to pinpoint a section of their phalanx with all of his strongest troops and broke through the line at one point. The Persians now had their army split in two and facing the wrong direction - turning charriots and elephants was a long process, in which time Alexander’s troops had swarmed in and massacred the exposed troops causing the army to fall.

In World War II France attacked Germany after it’s conquest of Poland but was thoroughly defeated despite a stronger army and more allies. What did Germany do? They used a variation of the same tactic to defeat a stronger force. 

In a campaign, volunteers are your army, and you’re up against the rest of your nation. Time spent calling, catching up and empowering your volunteers is the most valuable time spent as a coordinator. The less jobs you can do yourself, the more opportunity you are giving to others to step up, join your army and be given a chance to share their knowledge and skills. This all builds your infantry so that when you go in for the attack on your one target, there’s an army of troops already charging with media and grass roots action to make your group seem a lot bigger and more powerful than it really is.

How do you transition to such a hand-off approach?

First thing to do is to build rapport with your friends/volunteers. Rapport = trust + comfort.

Trust doesn’t mean to throw a job at someone and say “yep, I reckon they can manage that”. Trust means get to know the person. Hang out with them and learn about their passions and hardships. Connect with who they are as a person, have them understand your journey and then build a relationship from there. You can only trust a person if they know that they are being trusted, otherwise it’s just a word.

I’ve been organising a project lately and also been a helper on someone else’s project so I learnt this on the job. My way was - Get together with a bunch of people, talk about what needs to happen, delegate the tasks, set up accountability mechanisms and away we go. The way I experienced someone else’s was - we developed a shared passion for the project’s success through conversation, we talked about how we can do it, I took on my own things that I wanted to achieve and the accountability was already built in because I was accountable to myself from the trust that was set up. 

Secondly, plan way in advance. If every step is outlined 1 month in advance, all you have to do is guide people to fit in to fill those roles. Just asking people to do a task that you’ve set up is an unsustainable approach that’s not worth your time because they’ll do the task, not understand the bigger picture and wait until they get delegated to next time. If they are a part of the process of outlining their task then they can use that process to take initiative for next time. If you can manage a project but not be involved in any of the small tasks, then you’ve been successful in coordinating your volunteers as a director. If they start coming with questions on the process and help you to refine the tasks at hand, then you’ve been a successful enabler and you’re actively empowering your volunteers to step up.

 

For me, when undertaking a project, my goal is to be an enabling director. Holding the vision for where the project needs to go and allowing people to step up on their own accord into positions that suit them. I want people to feel comfortable working with me and growing our capacity together. There’s no use in the old hierarchical system where jobs just get delegated - it’s such an inefficient use of people’s skills and motivations. Be vulnerable to your fellow campaigners and they will take the opportunity to step up and help shape the project in their own special way.

 

http://Keep Recycling your garbage, folks!

6 months ago

BBC News - Higgs boson-like particle discovery claimed at LHC

peteuplink:

Cern scientists revealing results from the Large Hadron Collider have claimed the discovery of a new particle consistent with the Higgs boson.

10 months ago - 223

Entropy Wins: Civilisations Decline: Global Warming? Nah! Not Happening Here. (USA)

wotfigo:

Heat wave rolls through U.S., toppling records – Over 2,300 broken in June

According to the agency’s (National Climate Data Centre) data, 41 records have fallen or been tied in the past seven days, and the same number in the past 30 days. Over the past 365 days, 233 all-time records have…

10 months ago - 1

The Rules of the Climate Change game: Futerra

If you haven’t seen this before and you consider yourself a climate change activist then I highly recommend reading through how to communicate the story in this report by Futerra.

My Favorite part is Section Two starting on page 23 of the report. It outlines a point that is so true to every day thinking yet it has never occurred to me and I’ve never seen it described in one of these papers before:

It’s called PRINCIPLE FIVE: Climate change must be ‘front of mind’ before persuasion works, and it discusses how for many people, choosing between options does not encompass the effect on climate change because it is not what is foremost in their brain at the decision time. So although many people say that they would make a decision based on climate change effects, at the deciding moment, they put climate change aside as not one of the most important things to consider. This is because climate change has not been successfully packaged as something you have a choice to change every day, so not making the choice (because you didn’t know there was one) is effectively choosing not to act on preventing climate change - even for the people who supposedly want to act to stop it!

“A good analogy is that of the advertising of sanitary products to women. Most men have sat through Tampax advertisements, seen packages on the shelves, or been in the vicinity when other, more complex and viral, messages are being used. But very few would really notice the messages, and even fewer would change their behaviour as a result. When it comes communicating climate change, one might as well be advertising Tampax to men – even clever messages will not work unless people realise they have a decision they need to make. Of course, very few men have to make a decision about Tampax, but it’s a good example of how we can ignore pervasive marketing if we choose to.”

11 months ago

The second is that climate change sceptics, hardly any of whom are climate scientists, and many of whom are funded by the fossil fuel industry, have induced a certain amount of uncertainty in the public mind about the issue. And this has been able to take root over the last few years because – and this is the third reason – the warming process appears to have paused.
No-one really knows why. A good guess is the gigantic cloud of sulphur emissions from Chinese power stations, which doubled their output of waste gases between 1996 and 2006: the sulphur particles have the opposite effect of the carbon emissions, and reflect back the sun’s heat. But unless the laws of physics are altered, those global carbon emissions, now 33 billion tons annually and rising at six per cent a year, are going to make world temperatures rise considerably in the coming decades with potentially disastrous consequences.

Article: The Green Movement at 50:Can the World be Saved?

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/the-green-movement-at-50-can-the-world-be-saved-7852039.html

An interesting excerpt that I hadn’t known before about why warming might have recently paused.

climateadaptation:

North Carolina outer beaches erode on average 2 feet per year. Some beaches erode at 8 feet every year. It’s worse when there are storms. This interactive map shows the most vulnerable beaches.
But, that’s not why I posted this chart.
The federal government pays North Carolina to restore these beaches. Beach restoration is an interesting and controversial process. A special boat is launched just off shore. In a process called dredging, the boat scrapes sand from the ocean floor. It then dumps and pumps the sand along the beach. I’ll post a video so you can see it. Some local taxes are used to pay for this, but the majority comes from American tax payers.
This type of beach nourishment is expected to go forever, or at least for as long as people choose to live in the areas. Thus, federal assistance is a sort of perpetual insurance for North Carolinians. In sum, North Carolina’s new law that bans local cities from using climate science are forced to depend on federal assistance to forever take care of their self-mad mess.
Follow Climate Adaptation.

climateadaptation:

North Carolina outer beaches erode on average 2 feet per year. Some beaches erode at 8 feet every year. It’s worse when there are storms. This interactive map shows the most vulnerable beaches.

But, that’s not why I posted this chart.

The federal government pays North Carolina to restore these beaches. Beach restoration is an interesting and controversial process. A special boat is launched just off shore. In a process called dredging, the boat scrapes sand from the ocean floor. It then dumps and pumps the sand along the beach. I’ll post a video so you can see it. Some local taxes are used to pay for this, but the majority comes from American tax payers.

This type of beach nourishment is expected to go forever, or at least for as long as people choose to live in the areas. Thus, federal assistance is a sort of perpetual insurance for North Carolinians. In sum, North Carolina’s new law that bans local cities from using climate science are forced to depend on federal assistance to forever take care of their self-mad mess.

Follow Climate Adaptation.

(Source: )

Grassroots Climate Change - the Rio+ 20 Summit

11 months ago

If all insects on Earth disappeared, within 50 years all life on
Earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the Earth,
within 50 years all forms of life would flourish.

Biologist Jonas Salk